Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2010-11-10 17:53:37
Size: 284
Editor: SteveLudtke
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2011-03-21 19:38:58
Size: 710
Editor: SteveLudtke
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
Q: What paper should I cite if I use EMAN2 for a reconstruction ? '''Q:''' What paper should I cite if I use EMAN2 for a reconstruction ?
Line 3: Line 3:
A: '''A:'''
While we plan to publish something a bit more up to date documenting newer procedures in EMAN2. This the main reference to cite.
Line 6: Line 7:

The most impressive structure published to date with EMAN2 alone (in case you want to document it's reliability) is this one:

Yuan S, Yu X, Topf M, Dorstyn L, Kumar S, Ludtke SJ, Akey CW (2011) Structure of the Drosophila apoptosome at 6.9 å resolution. Structure 19: 128-140

Q: What paper should I cite if I use EMAN2 for a reconstruction ?

A: While we plan to publish something a bit more up to date documenting newer procedures in EMAN2. This the main reference to cite.

Tang, G., Peng, L., Baldwin, P.R., Mann, D.S., Jiang, W., Rees, I. & Ludtke, S.J., 2007, EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy, Journal of structural biology, 157(1), pp. 38-46.

The most impressive structure published to date with EMAN2 alone (in case you want to document it's reliability) is this one:

Yuan S, Yu X, Topf M, Dorstyn L, Kumar S, Ludtke SJ, Akey CW (2011) Structure of the Drosophila apoptosome at 6.9 å resolution. Structure 19: 128-140

EMAN2/FAQ/CiteEman2 (last edited 2013-12-18 23:54:13 by SteveLudtke)